Forty-third President of the United States

Articles

A Collapsing Presidency, by Paul Craig Roberts, 20 Mar 2006
"Neocons do not believe in the US Constitution, civil liberties, the separation of powers ... According to published reports, President Bush described the Constitution as 'a scrap of paper.' Bush's attorney general, vice president, and secretary of defense ..., in violation of their oath of office, have openly declared that Bush, as commander-in-chief, is above the law."
Bush Is About To Attack Iran: Why Can't Americans See It?, by Paul Craig Roberts, 27 Jan 2007
"The American public and the US Congress are getting their backs up about the Bush Regime's determination to escalate the war in Iraq. ... This is all to the good. However, it misses the real issue – the Bush Regime's looming attack on Iran. ... Bush dismissed congressional disapproval with his statement, 'I'm the decision-maker.'"
Related Topic: Iran
Bush's Doublethink, by Sheldon Richman, 19 Jan 2007
Analyses President Bush's statements and possible implications, of a speech made on 10 Jan 2007
"Bush says what he needs to say in order to justify whatever it is he wants to do. The standard isn't truth and logic but appearance. ... Bush may practice Orwellian doublethink, the ability to hold two contradictory ideas at once, never letting himself see that both can't be true."
Bush's Learning Problem, by Joseph Sobran, The Reactionary Utopian, 12 Oct 2006
"... learning to play chess ... When you move a piece, you have to think about how your opponent may respond to it. I guess President Bush never learned that lesson. A few years ago, he was using expressions like regime change, axis of evil, global democratic revolution, and ridding the earth of tyranny without stopping to think how his opponents might react."
Bush's Place in History, by Joseph Sobran, The Reactionary Utopian, 6 May 2006
"Back in 2000, candidate George W. Bush described himself as 'a uniter, not a divider.' ... during the 2004 campaign, the polls strongly indicated that America was evenly divided again. ... Bush won a decisive victory ... boasting of his 'political capital.' Only a few months after his second inauguration, that capital was exhausted."
Bush's Wartime Dictatorship: The threat of presidential supremacism, by Justin Raimondo, 21 Dec 2005
"The new presidential absolutism infuses not only Bush's foreign policy, which asserts the 'right' of the White House to make war on anyone, anywhere, anytime, and for any reason, but also, increasingly, his domestic policies. ... in response to the NSA revelations, the president summoned the executive editor and the publisher of the New York Times to the Oval Office ... "
Elizabeth de la Vega, Bringing Bush to Court, by Elizabeth de la Vega, TomDispatch, 27 Nov 2006
"... I intend to present a hypothetical indictment to a hypothetical grand jury. The defendants are President George W. Bush ... If the indictment and grand jury are hypothetical, the evidence is not. I've prepared for this case, just as I would have done for any other case in my years as a prosecutor, by reviewing all of the available relevant information."
How Much More Harm Can Bush Do?, by Paul Craig Roberts, 7 Mar 2006
Discusses the casualties resulting from the 2003 Iraq invasion, the changed world opinion of the United States and the lobbies that benefit from the continuation of hostilities
"Bush-Cheney have not brought Iraqis democracy, but they have stolen their oil revenues. ... Far from making Americans safe by attacking a country that posed no threat to the U.S., Bush and Cheney have alarmed the Russians and the Chinese. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Gen. Yury Baluyevsky, chief of the Russian General Staff, have both warned that the Bush regime's military aggression and drive for hegemony are setting off another arms race."
More Bush Insults, by Sheldon Richman, 12 Oct 2005
Comments on George W. Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court and on his speech asking for support on the "war on terror"
"Everybody is good at something, and George Bush is good at insulting our intelligence. ... This is the same man who gave us No Child Left Behind, who signed McCain-Feingold, and who claims the power to imprison American citizens indefinitely without charge just by branding them, without appeal, enemy combatants. ... To be fair, we can’t be sure if Bush presumes we are morons or if he is sincerely ignorant."
Mr. Bush, Meet Walter Jones, by Patrick J. Buchanan, 16 Jan 2007
"If tomorrow Bush took out Iran's nuclear facilities, would a Senate that lacks the courage to cut funds for an unpopular war really impeach him for denying a nuclear capability to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? ... Asked if Congress could stop him from surging 21,500 troops into Iraq, Bush on 60 Minutes brushed aside Congress as irrelevant."
Outsourcing Torture, by Sheldon Richman, 29 Sep 2006
Discusses the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian sent to Syria for interrogation on suspectied ties to al-Qaeda
"If you want to see the bare essence of the Bush administration, behold its policy of 'rendition' ... under which American officials send terrorist suspects ... to countries where they will be tortured, keeping the U.S. government's hands clean of the monstrous treatment. Can anyone with a sense of justice or humane bone in his body defend such a shameful policy? ... This is America under George W. Bush. It's not the America we learned about growing up. Something has gone badly wrong. When will we do something about it?"
Slipped His Moorings, by Charley Reese, 9 Sep 2006
"The president, I believe, is desperate to be what he knows he is not — a great man. He has fantasized that he is a second Winston Churchill leading the forces of democracy in a great crusade against the forces of darkness. The only trouble is, there is nobody out there in the dark."
Related Topic: Terrorism
The Case for Impeachment: Why we can no longer afford George W. Bush, by Lewis H. Lapham, Harper's Magazine, 27 Feb 2006
"We have before us in the White House a thief who steals the country's good name and reputation for his private interest and personal use; a liar who seeks to instill in the American people a state of fear; a televangelist who engages the United States in a never-ending crusade against all the world's evil, a wastrel ..."
The George W. Bush 'What Me Worry?' Quiz, by Jim Cox, 2 Apr 2007
"When the Taliban in Afghanistan offered to turn over Osama Bin Laden to the U.S. in the fall 2001 if evidence were provided of his involvement in the 9/11 attacks, the response of George W. Bush was to: a. immediately work with the Afghan government to provide the evidence as a better solution than a war in which hundreds of American soldiers would die. ..."
The President Seems Out of Touch With Events on the Ground in Iraq, by Robert Higgs, 31 May 2006
"The president's speech employed, as such speeches usually do, an abstract, high-flown rhetoric intended to stir the listeners' patriotic juices and to place U.S. actions in the purest possible light. The reports of the massacre at Haditha, however, shine a different light on the war."
The Price of Bush, by Joseph Sobran, 11 Oct 2005
"... he looks unexpectedly desperate, confused, ineffectual. What does he stand for? Only one thing: the failed war he has already staked his reputation on. He has subordinated everything to that, and in its absence it would be impossible to name any philosophy, conservative or otherwise, he could be identified with."
The Repudiation of Bush, by Sheldon Richman, 10 Nov 2006
Comments on the results of the November 2004 U.S. elections and on the first George W. Bush administration
"It's reasonable to conclude from the election results that most voters felt the Republicans had been in power too long. The hopeless war in Iraq, the culture of corruption and incompetence, the spending binge (which includes the war), the grating social conservatism, and the autocratic arrogance approaching the dictatorial all culminated in a thunderous repudiation of President Bush and the Republican Party."
Related Topic: Democratic Party
A Democratic Dictatorship, by Jacob G. Hornberger, Future of Freedom, May 2006
"Bush is effectively interpreting it to mean that Congress granted him what the German Enabling Act granted Hitler — the power to override constitutional protections of civil liberties. ... There is no merit whatsoever ... to Bush's argument that the Constitution grants omnipotent powers to a president when he puts on the helmet of a military commander in chief."
Related Topics: Democracy, Terrorism
Americans Have Lost Their Country, by Paul Craig Roberts, 1 Mar 2007
Discusses the neoconservatives in the George W. Bush administration and the rationale for their actions furthering wars in the Middle East
"Bush accuses Iran of arming the Iraqi insurgents, a charge that experts regard as improbable. The Iraqi insurgents are Sunni. ... Bush's accusation requires us to believe that Iran is arming the enemies of its allies. On the basis of this absurd accusation – a pure invention – Bush has ordered a heavy concentration of aircraft carrier attack forces off Iran's coast, and he has moved US attack planes to Turkish bases and other US bases in countries contingent to Iran."
Beginning of the end of America: Olbermann addresses the Military Commissions Act in a special comment, by Keith Olbermann, 18 Oct 2006
Transcript and video of the show segment
"Habeas corpus? Gone. The Geneva Conventions? Optional. The moral force we shined outwards to the world as an eternal beacon, and inwards at ourselves as an eternal protection? Snuffed out. These things you have done, Mr. Bush, they would be 'the beginning of the end of America.'"
Related Topic: Writ of Habeas Corpus
Big-Spending Republicans Can Learn from Ireland's Reforms, by Benjamin Powell, 17 Sep 2003
Contrasts U.S. government spending in the 1990's and early 2000's with the approach taken in Ireland from the late 1980's
"Spending has actually increased more rapidly under Bush than it did under Clinton. Total real discretionary outlays during Bush's first three years have increased 23.8 percent. ... Two departments that were on the original 1995 list of 'unnecessary federal agencies,' the Department of Education and the Department of Commerce, have seen their budgets increase by 60.8 percent and 9.6 percent respectively during Bush's first three years."
Bush Broke the Law, by Charley Reese, 31 Jan 2006
"... the president appears to have violated both the law and the Constitution. A recent Zogby poll revealed that 52 percent of Americans think that if this is proven to be true, then the president should be impeached. This is a most serious issue. It goes to the question, Is the president above the law?"
Bush's Secret Surveillance State, by Anthony Gregory, 26 Dec 2005
"By December 19, ... Attorney General Alberto Gonzales went so far as to say that the president had the 'inherent authority' to perform such secret, warrantless searches of people in the United States. ... Will the president actually get away with such blatant disregard for the Bill of Rights, the balance of powers, ..."
Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship, by James Bovard, 9 Oct 2006
Details some of Bush's (more than 800) signing statements and his "unitary executive" doctrine
"Bush is apparently convinced that he is entitled to govern in secrecy, and any provision of a law to the contrary violates his imperial prerogatives. George W. Bush has added more than 800 'signing statements' to new laws since he took office. Earlier presidents occasionally appended such comments to new statutes, but Bush is the first to use signing statements routinely to nullify key provisions of new laws."
Related Topic: Rule of Law
Do Elections Guarantee Freedom?, by James Bovard, Future of Freedom, Nov 2007
Discusses whether democratic elections achieve the purported objective of "will of the people" controlling the government
"Two days after his 2004 reelection victory, President George W. Bush declared, 'When you win, there is a feeling that the people have spoken and embraced your point of view ... and the people made it clear what they wanted.' But did voters on November 2 'consent' to the destruction of Fallujah in the following weeks? Did they consent to the nomination of a Homeland Security czar who was openly hostile to any criticism of politicians?"
Dubya and Dubai, by J. Neil Schulman, Rational Review, 22 Feb 2006
"The purchase of the British company P&O, which has been operating our ports, by the Dubai Ports World company, which is wholly owned by the government of the United Arab Emirates, was approved in secret by the Bush administration, likely months ago. ... Bush is a moron when it comes to PR, and apparently his advisors are no better."
Related Topic: Dubai
Free Speech on the Ropes, by James Bovard, Future of Freedom, Jan 2006
Constrasts President Bush's "we love our freedom" rhetoric with actions to suppress dissent by establishing "free speech zones"
"Bursey later commented, ... Bush gets off the plane. And I can see the whole tableau through the bars in the paddy wagon. He goes inside the hangar and gives this speech where he says they hate us because we're so free, and here I am handcuffed in the back of a paddy wagon, thinking, 'No, Mr. Bush, they don't hate us because we're free. They hate us because we're hypocrites.'"
Related Topics: Freedom of Speech, Ron Paul
"Free-Speech Zone": The administration quarantines dissent, by James Bovard, The American Conservative, 15 Dec 2003
Provides various examples of "free speech zone" incidents as well as reactions in the U.S. and overseas
"Secret Service agent Brian ... Marr's comments are a mockery of this country's rich heritage of vigorous protests. Somehow, all of a sudden, after George W. Bush became president people became so stupid that federal agents had to cage them to prevent them from walking out in front of speeding vehicles."
Related Topic: Freedom of Speech
George W. Bush's Nixonomics, by Gregory Bresiger, Mises Daily, 22 May 2006
"President George W. Bush's statist policies should not been viewed as a departure from the Republican traditions. Bush's economic policies are a continuation of Nixonomics. We should also understand that Bush, like Nixon, cannot resist the political temptation of public-sector spending and various price controls to achieve short-term political goals."
Glorious War!, by Joseph Sobran, The Reactionary Utopian, 31 Aug 2006
Discusses how the Republican Party and conservatism became associated with militarism and war
"Two Bush administrations have proved that. War on Panama, war on Iraq, war on 'terror,' war on Afghanistan, war on Iraq again, and war on Iran, comin' up. And of course the recent Israeli war on Lebanon was waged with George W. Bush's complicity. ... The presidency of George W. Bush has been one long object lesson in unintended consequences. It's amusing to recall that his father was kidded for using the phrase wouldn't be prudent, an expression the son could profitably adopt."
Related Topics: War, Conservatism, Republican Party
Hidden Government, by Sheldon Richman, 1 Sep 2006
Discusses the July 2006 Israeli attack on Lebanon, which resulted in 800 dead and was carried out with assistance from the Bush administration
"Reporting by Seymour Hersh ... and other sources indicate that the Bush administration actively helped the Israeli government plan an attack on Lebanon. ... I don't recall the 2004 presidential candidates debating whether the government should have the power to help other governments, funded and armed by American taxpayers, make war against civilian populations. Where did President Bush find this blank check?"
Related Topics: Government, Lebanon
Impeach the American People!, by Butler Shaffer, 17 Nov 2006
Comments on proposals to bring George W. Bush and others in his administration to "justice", observing that most Americans went into a "moral slumber" that allowed the former to "turn America into the 21st century equivalent of 1939 Germany"
"[This whooping and hollering] is driven by the same refusal of men and women to examine what they have made of themselves that allowed Mr. Bush to mobilize their 'dark side' energies into murderous attacks upon hundreds of thousands of innocent people; to torture and detain — without hopes of trial — anyone the administration saw fit to deprive of their liberties; and to turn America into the kind of dystopian police-state that was beyond the fertile imaginations of Messrs. Orwell and Huxley."
Iraq Exit Strategy: America's Path Forward [PDF], by Libertarian Party, 29 Jun 2005
Proposal by the Libertarian National Committee for the U.S. to remove its troops from Iraq and a direct-aid program to allow Iraq to reconstruct its infrastructure (note: the occupation lasted another six years)
"In the final days before the invasion, President George W. Bush declared that Iraq was in violation of United Nations disarmament resolutions. President Bush set a deadline for Saddam Hussein to surrender his weapons of mass destruction and subsequently disarm. It was made clear that if Saddam did not comply with all of the U.N. resolutions, the U.S. would invade Iraq and remove him from power."
I Resign From the Mont Pelerin Society, by Paul Craig Roberts, 21 Aug 2008
Explains Roberts' rationale for resigning from the Society
"As far as I am aware, the MPS has not addressed the Bush administration's assault on US civil liberties or the disrespect the Bush administration has shown for the US Constitution and international law, particularly the Geneva Conventions. ... The alacrity with which the Heritage Foundation jumped on the Bush administration's propaganda bandwagon about 'the Russian invasion of Georgia' epitomizes the new association of 'freedom' with American hegemony."
Related Topics: Mont Pelerin Society, War
Is This Really War?, by Sheldon Richman, 16 Jun 2006
Discusses the Haditha killings and argues that U.S. troops in Iraq are acting more as a police force for the new Iraqi regime
"President Bush invaded Iraq, a country that represented no threat to the American people or the territory of the United States. In other words, the U.S. forces that bomb and shoot Iraqis don't have to be there. They are not responding to impending danger to Americans."
Least We Forget, by Paul Craig Roberts, 25 Feb 2006
"It is a great lie that America needs to give up its civil liberties, the separation of powers, the Geneva Conventions, and humane treatment of prisoners in order to defend itself against terrorism. If these are the Bush regime's terms for protection, Americans need quickly to find another government."
Related Topic: Communism
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski: U.S. Air Force, 1983-2003, by Brian Lamb, Q&A, 2 Apr 2006
Transcript and Real Audio
"... we all know from the Bush Administration his most important criteria is loyalty, and I think this warped sense of loyalty, not to the Constitution of course, which is what we as military officers swear to uphold, the Constitution, all enemies foreign and domestic, ... you've got to remember that, the loyalty is not to that. The loyalty is to the people and to the agenda ..."
Machiavelli and U.S. Politics, Part 3: Lies and Appearances, by Lawrence M. Ludlow, 19 Aug 2005
"The president has a bad habit of approving bailouts for failed airlines, throwing money into the bottomless pit of medical-benefit entitlements, signing lard-filled highway bills, and stuffing the coffers of public schools that regularly churn out bumper crops of criminals and nitwits in roughly equal proportion."
Machiavelli and U.S. Politics, Part 4: War, by Lawrence M. Ludlow, 22 Aug 2005
Part of a six-segment series examining The Prince vis-à-vis contemporary U.S. politics; this article covers Machiavelli's simple advice on war and contrasts it with that of James Madison and Robert Higgs in Crisis and Leviathan
"When it turned out that there were no WMDs and no links between Iraq and the attack on the World Trade Center, the deception was exposed for all to see. Even Bush could not bear the charge of being called a liar — not to mention a hypocrite — since he frequently voiced his faith in God and warned of evil-doers lurking in every nook and cranny. Consequently, the president concocted a plausible half-truth to cover his tracks. He claimed he had been misinformed by intelligence experts."
Meet the press, with David Letterman: The talk-show host proves to be twice as tough on George W. Bush as many reporters on the campaign trail., by Jake Tapper, Salon, 20 Oct 2000
"... Letterman asked Bush repeatedly about the death penalty, Texas' abysmal environmental record and foreign affairs. ... Letterman then asked Bush about the terrorist murder of 17 U.S. sailors in Yemen. Seriously. ... 'Now are you talking about retaliation or due process of law?' Letterman asked."
Related Topic: David Letterman
Mr. Bush, Mind Your Own Business, by Sheldon Richman, 21 Oct 2005
Criticises George W. Bush's advice to Americans that they should drive less in order to conserve gasoline
"So President Bush wants us to conserve gasoline by driving less. Cut out the nonessential car trips, he says. ... President Bush likes to portray himself as a fan of the free market, but talk and pandering are cheap. The test of a free-market advocate is how he reacts during a sudden fall in supply of a widely used product. ... Now which is President Bush? Here's a clue: he condemned 'price gougers' and hectored us about our driving."
Related Topic: Free Market
Obama's Iraqi Fairy Tale, by Sheldon Richman, 28 Mar 2014
Examines, in devastating detail, Obama's March 2014 remarks about the 2003 Iraqi invasion
"Every top member of the Bush administration having anything to do with 'national security' lied to the public at one time or another. People who questioned the 'slam-dunk' intelligence were dismissed as pusillanimous or soft on Saddam. If that counts as open debate, then there is no difference between the Bush administration and any outright autocratic regime."
Pentagon Whistle-Blower on the Coming War With Iran, by Karen Kwiatkowski, 27 Feb 2007
Interviewed by James Harris and Josh Scheer of Truthdig; topics include possible conflict with Iran, the Pentagon situation prior to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Office of Special Plans, Vietnam, terrorism and neoconservatism
"You have political appointees in every government agency, and they switch out every time you get a new president ... So Bush was no different. He brought in ... a number of political appointees at what you would call a lower level ... And they're not military officers, they're civilians. And they’re brought in, and this is where the propaganda was kind of put together, this is where the so-called alternative intelligence assessments were put together by the civilian appointees of the Bush Administration. "
Revisiting a Libertarian Classic: Nock's Our Enemy, the State, by Sheldon Richman, Future of Freedom, Mar 2006
Examines some of the major themes of Nock's Our Enemy, the State
"The government has gathered information on anti-war groups and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The president is angry that ordinary people have found out about this. He is planning not to stop these obnoxious activities, but rather to find out who gave him away. In his view, the Constitution and the Congress's blank check after 9/11 bestow on him the power to do virtually anything if he can rationalize it as necessary to prosecute the war on terror. This is quite a claim, considering that there is no reason why the war on terror shouldn't go on forever."
Rings of War, by Charley Reese, 1 Jan 2007
Reflects on war as concentric rings with soldiers in the center and the general public in the outer circle, criticising George W. Bush and Congress for not ending the 2003 Iraq War and suggesting a general tax for future wars as incentive to end them
"President Bush has no interest in ending the war. Before the terrorist attack in 2001, he was at odds and ends and didn't seem to know what he wanted to do. But now he enjoys being a war president. It's given him a role to play. He's not going to give that up."
That Death Toll, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., 21 Jun 2006
Comments on White House Press Secretary Tony Snow's remark about the reporting of the death of the 2,500th American soldier in the 2003 Iraq War
"The Bush administration is ensconced in its marble castles in Washington, D.C., and meets average soldiers only in carefully managed PR events. ... The only real moral issue that strikes the Bush administration — which is directly responsible for every one of these lost lives — is annoyance that anyone would be upset. The fodder knew what they were getting into when they signed up. It's dangerous work. In any case, it is a noble cause, or so they are told."
Related Topics: Iraq War (2003), Tony Snow, War
The 9/11 Servility Reflex, by James Bovard, Future of Freedom, Dec 2007
Discusses how the general American public reacted after the 9/11 attacks and how the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media helped reinforce that reaction
"The 9/11 Commission became the Bush administration's most famous faith-based initiative. The commission appeared far more concerned with restoring trust than in revealing truth. Bush and Cheney were allowed to testify without a transcript and not under oath. Americans never heard what they said. ... The White House was allowed to edit the final version of the commission's report before it was publicly released."
Related Topics: September 11, 2001, Government
The Abominations of War: From My Lai to Haditha, by Cindy Sheehan, 5 Jun 2006
Responds to those who demand to "support our troops" and the President by listing various immoral and illegal actions, suggesting instead that George W. Bush be prosecuted as a war criminal and offering support to those who disobey unlawful orders
"In a stunning display of shameless hypocrisy George Bush said of the (not uncommon) butchering of innocent civilians in Haditha: 'Our troops have been trained on core values throughout their training, but obviously there was an incident that took place in Iraq.' ... George Bush is correct. A 'full and complete' investigation needs to be made into the crimes against humanity in Iraq, and if justice prevails, this would in turn lead to the trial and conviction of George and the rest of the neocon purveyors of torture and murder, for which the maximum penalties should be applied."
The Endless War on Terrorism, by Jacob G. Hornberger, 1 Sep 2004
Reflects on President George W. Bush response ("I don't think we can it") when asked about the War on Terror
"It feels good when a public official, especially the president of the United States, speaks the truth, which is what happened on Monday when President George W. Bush uttered words that The Future of Freedom Foundation has been publishing ever since 9/11 — 'I don't think you can win [the war on terror].' Well, duh! Of course, the president is absolutely right, even if he did backtrack a bit the following day ..."
The State in the Dock, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., 26 May 2006
Reflects on the then ongoing trial of Saddam Hussein (2004-2006) and wonders what would happen if other heads of state, including George W. Bush, were put on trial
"The trial is being administered and run and decided by the government of a conquering nation, one led by a man who clearly had a personal vendetta against Saddam, and who used the most duplicitous methods to drag his country into an imperial venture ... As an American, it sickens me to see George Bush using this trial as a way of morally whitewashing his conquest."
Related Topics: Government, Iraq, The State
Under the Shadow of Inflationomics, by Hans F. Sennholz, Mises Daily, 1 Jun 2006
"Prodded by President George Walker Bush, Congress passed a large multiyear tax cut, and the US Treasury sent out tax rebates to boost consumer spending. Thereafter, the economy seemed to shake off national disasters and soaring energy prices. Labor productivity apparently rose and the nation's unemployment rate declined again."
U.S. Regime Change, Torture, and Murder in Chile, by Jacob G. Hornberger, 24 Nov 2004
Discusses the unwelcome reception given to George W. Bush on a visit to Chile and various reasons for Chilean animosity towards the U.S. government, contrasting it with general opinion about these matters in the U.S. and the inaction in Congress
"President Bush's recent trip to South America provides a valuable foreign-policy lesson for Americans. The president was greeted in Santiago, Chile, by some 30,000 angry demonstrators. But it was not only Bush's invasion and war of aggression against Iraq that Chileans were angry about. Unlike so many Americans, the Chilean people have not fallen for the 'We invaded Iraq to spread democracy' line that U.S. officials moved up to rationale number one after failing to find those infamous weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."
Related Topics: Chile, Terrorism
War Loses, Again, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., 8 Nov 2006
Reflects on the results of the 2006 U.S. mid-term elections
"This election has probably sealed Bush’s place in history as a failed war president who used a period of national anxiety about terrorism for his own personal aggrandizement and the enrichment of his coterie. ... Bush undertook this war with arrogance and claims of god-like power. The result has been catastrophic. And apparently this amazing failure of government had an impact on the vote."
What's Become of Americans?, by Paul Craig Roberts, 22 Mar 2006
Ponders the lack of reaction by Americans to events related to the Iraq War, such as the missing WMDs, Abu Ghraib, mass surveillance, "free speech" zones, the death toll and the Haditha massacre
"If this story is true, under Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush's leadership, proud and honorable U.S. Marines have degenerated into the Waffen SS. Those of us raised on John Wayne war movies find this very hard to take. A fish rots from the head. Clearly, deception in the Oval Office is corrupting the U.S. military. One reader reported that on March 19 his local PBS station aired a program which discussed the deaths of two young American soldiers in friendly fire incidents similar to Pat Tillman's death. "
Will the Democrats Become Part of the Problem?, by Paul Craig Roberts, 10 Nov 2006
Discusses the outcome of the 2006 U.S. mid-term elections and offers recommendations primarily for congressional Democrats
"In violation of his oath of office, Bush used signing statements to negate laws passed by Congress, not with a veto, but with his personal opinion. Bush, thus, elevated himself above the rule of law that has protected America from becoming a tyranny and made a mockery of the separation of powers that are a foundation of American liberty. ... The other issue is the blatant corruption in the Bush regime's contract practices."
Wilson in the Mirror, by John M. Peters, 23 May 2006
Compares Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush, drawing several parallels between the two
"President Bush appears to be embarked upon the same delusional path as his predecessor was at the turn of the last century. ... President Bush would produce the ironically-named Patriot Act to wield against those who dared oppose his crusade against the evil. More Draconian than either of Mr. Wilson's laws, the Patriot Act provides virtually unlimited powers to the executive to monitor, arrest and imprison anyone whom the government deems a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer."

Cartoons and Comic Strips

Decider, by Mark Fiore, 10 May 2006
Related Topic: Rule of Law
Finally, I've found my legacy!, by Stuart Carlson, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 15 Mar 2008
Trusting Bush, by Mike Luckovich, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 18 May 2006
OK, I cheated on you ... but those babies aren't mine!!, by Joel Pett, Lexington Herald-Leader, 24 Aug 2008
Related Topic: Statue of Liberty

Books

The Bush Betrayal, by James Bovard, 7 Aug 2004
Electronic text of first chapter available at Future of Freedom Foundation
"This book does not aim to analyze all Bush policies. Instead, it examines an array of his domestic and foreign actions that vivify the damage Bush is inflicting and the danger he poses both to America and the world. Bush governs like an elective monarch, entitled to reverence and deference on all issues."
United States v. George W. Bush et al.
    by Elizabeth de la Vega, 2006
What We've Lost
    by Graydon Carter, Sep 2004
Attention Deficit Democracy, by James Bovard, 10 Jan 2006
Electronic text of Introduction available at LewRockwell.com
"The same types of myths have grown up around democracy that long propped up monarchs. In the 1500s, peasants were encouraged to believe that the king was chosen by God to serve His purposes on Earth. Today, Americans are encouraged to believe that Bush's reelection victory is a sign of God's approval of Bush's reign."
Related Topics: Democracy, Voting

Videos


Bush Speaks the Truth (Election 2000 Debates), 2000
Audio clips and photos of then Governor George Bush during the Presidential debates, particularly about nation building and a "humble" foreign policy